CHAPTER 41
The Tracy Family History
Waxhaws

![]()
It was now known as the “War in the
South.” Things looked pretty dismal for the Americans. The entire American army
had surrendered, laying open all the South from Virginia to Florida.
A deep depression descended upon the Patriots in the Southern
provinces. The Tories, long suppressed, were elated. The neutrals did not care.
When news of the Capture of Charleston reached the British
people, it had an electrifying effect. Their enthusiasm for the war, long on the
wane, was now revived.
After the fall of Charleston, such was the gloom throughout
the South that many thought the cause was lost and accepted the inevitable. "The
people at that time not much accustomed to arms & finding no troops to support
them submitted when they saw the Kings troops…"
What one does not realize is that the American Revolutionary
War created a complex political game in the capitals of the world. All nations,
their kings and advisers, were constantly at war with one another, or between
wars preparing for the next war. They did not usually fight alone, but in
alliances with other nations. The leaders watched the events and battles in
America with great interest.
When the French entered the war by signing an alliance in
February of 1778, the British knew the colonies were lost. However, the French
commitment was not absolute. What France would give in men, supplies, and money
depended on how the Americas did on the field of battle. The French could pull
out at any time.
One of the reasons for the British invading the Southern
colonies was to counter Spain's claims on British territory. The Spanish held
Florida, and like all nations were looking to expand its empire at the expense
of other empires. Spain had a dangerously large navy. England was also attacking
Spanish possessions.
Capturing Charleston would put political pressure on Spain,
and hopefully give the English better bargaining power in what were complex
diplomatic negotiations.
The British commander had all of the Southern colonies at his
feet. However, he had a technical problem. He wanted to rally the Tories to the
king's standard, and many of the Tories were willing (some were not). For years,
under Patriot control they had accepted (military) paroles from the Patriot
government which meant they could not break parole and participate in the war
supporting the British in any capacity, especially as soldiers. According to the
rules of war, they had to remain neutral.
The entire strategy of the South was based on the assumption
that the Tories, long abused by the dominant Patriots, would flock to the
British standard and fight for the king.
The British did not have unlimited regiments of soldiers to
send to America. They not only had to keep a full army in the North, but the army in the
South had to be supplemented with local Tory troops.
The Tories were ecstatic and cheered the British soldiers,
but they did not flock to them. They came, but not in "flockable" numbers.
The British did not occupy themselves with giving parties for
the Tory girls in Charleston. They quickly fanned out across the South Carolina
countryside. The British army sent three sizable military units to secure the
newly gained territory; to show the British presence and to rally the Tories. In
addition, they sent smaller, faster, troops on raids.
A chain of military posts (forts, supply depots, outposts)
were established in the countryside. These posts were mostly manned by Tory
troops. (This is a little confusing as it is not clear if they were the Tory
soldiers from the North who accompanied the invasion, or if they were local
Tories. One report says they were manned by Tory militia. That would mean local
Tories. To add to the confusion, throughout the war in the South, many times the
Tory soldiers were referred to as British, because they were in fact fighting
for the British army; that is, Tory soldiers under British officers.)
The British army quickly gained control of the entire South.
Their chain of forts guaranteed control. ...that is, as far as the British Brown
Bessie musket could fire a ball, which was 100 yards, 50 yards effective.
The people came from great distances to the British posts to
take the oath of loyalty to the king. The inhabitants then turned their
attentions to farming and making a living. To many of the people in the Southern
colonies, the war was over.
The first British commander was amiable; but he was quickly replaced by
a commander who was a despot who treated the people in a despotic way. The
Patriots again rose up and fought as guerrillas. They struck isolated outposts
and
supply trains; attacked river and road traffic, and tied up large numbers of
British troops.
When Charleston was besieged, as at Boston, many militias
marched to the defense of the city. General George Washington sent all Virginia soldiers in the
Continental Line to defend Charleston.
They were coming in from everywhere. In the Valley of
Virginia was the 3rd Virginia Regiment, 350 Continentals on furlough to their
homes. They were under the command of Colonel Buford. (Quite often in reading
history many of the officers referred to as being Colonels were in fact
Lieutenant Colonels, one rank below.) Buford was in fact a Lieutenant Colonel
and was married to Magdelene's granddaughter.
These 3rd Regiment Virginians were gathered from their homes to go to
the aide of Charleston. One of their captains, with his 50 Rockbridge men, was
Adam Wallace, brother to Andrew Wallace who had escaped from the beleaguered
city. One 1860 newspaper report says that Buford's Regiment marched from
Pittsylvania and the other adjoining counties in Virginia. They left their homes
in the spring of 1780. Another source says they left in March.
One historian disputes the above information. "Some early
histories state that the 11th Virginia was the regiment cut to pieces by
Tarleton at Waxhaws, but this is in error. The commanding officer of the
Continentals at Waxhaws was the Colonel of the 11th Virginia (Buford) but his
men were actually new recruits or recalled veterans intended for the various
regiments of the Virginia Line."
For the entire war military units constantly are the same,
but the names are redesignated. Units are broken up and reformed under different
designations. This was caused by war casualties--being killed or wounded in
action, dying through disease, enlistments ending, or officers constantly being reassigned to other units.
Throughout the military history of our peoples, the designations of their
regiments are confusing.
Forty miles from Charleston Buford received word that the city had
surrendered. Buford was then ordered to retreat and escort Governor Rutledge, and his
party, to the town of Hillsborough, North Carolina, to remove him from danger.
Buford was making a slow retreat. Earlier, British cavalry
leader Colonel Banastre Tarleton had disbursed Lt. Colonel William Washington's
cavalry. Buford wanted the remnants to have time to catch up with his men.
The British commander, Cornwallis wanted to capture the rebel
Governor, and he wanted the 3rd Virginians. Again, Washington sent all Virginia
Continentals to defend Charleston. They were all taken at Charleston
...except...Buford's men. They were the last Continental's in the South.
Cornwallis was in pursuit with 2,500 men, but it was a slow
ponderous army with all of the implements of war that only slow you down:
baggage wagons, artillery, etc. (The British usually attacked in style.)
He decided to detach and send his ablest cavalry commander,
with handpicked troops, to overtake Buford. The man he chose was Colonel
(Lieutenant Colonel) Banastre Tarleton.
Tarleton came from a well-to-do family. His father was mayor
of Liverpool. The father's wealth come from the slave trade. Tarleton had
graduated from Oxford, but at the age of 21 purchased a lowly position of
Coronet in the army. At Oxford, and in his military life to come, he had a
reputation for being wild, with a penchant for drinking and gambling. He was
“roistering.”
“Out of family pride he (Banestre Tarleton’s father)
purchased the old seat at Aigburth, and then Bolesworth Castle...” –Robert D.
Bass, historian
Unlike many monarchs of the times, the King of England
did not rule with absolute power. He was subject to the approval of
Parliament, which consisted of two houses: The House of Lords and the House of
Commons. In fact, Parliament ruled over the king. The House of Lords was
hereditary. The House of Commons was by election.
Not every man could vote. One had to own substantial
property, which automatically eliminated 85-90% of the adult male population.
There were other qualifications. You had to serve without pay, which meant that
you had to be independently wealthy. Of course, one had to belong to the
approved religions, which eliminated all Catholics and Jews.
Both houses were equal. The hereditary House of Lords could
veto any acts by the elected House of Commons. Half of the members of Parliament were elected through a
sometimes wild democratic system, and half through a system of purchase with the member not necessarily
living in the district that he represented. (It was common for a young man when
reaching the age of 21 to be given a seat in Parliament by the family.) This
guaranteed that only the upper class; the aristocracy and nobility sat in Parliament.
The King controlled Parliament through a system of bribery. He had a large fund
specifically for the purpose of bribing members of parliament. The
ruling elite saw nothing wrong with this system. Their logical view was that those
who ruled were true Englishmen who only had the best interest of every
Englishman in their hearts and actions.
It was not
until 1832 that the middle class English man received the right to vote. The
working man could not vote until 1867. Only in 1885 were equal voting
districts created. This guaranteed that no longer was it possible for a village
of 10 people to hold 10 seats in parliament while a neighboring city of 10,000
had no seats.
On the eve of the American Revolution in 1776, the average
Englishman had as much chance of voting as the average black person had of
voting in Florida.
Tarleton arrived in New York City at the beginning of the war and
quickly made a name for himself. His rise to fame came when he was involved in
the capture of America's number-two general, Charles Lee. Lee was an Englishman
with rank in the British army. He changed sides and brought with him valuable
battlefield experience from Europe. However, Lee was more than eccentric, which
would cause him ingloriously to end his military career in the middle of the
war.
Tarleton was small. His looks were deceiving. He was a stocky, rough, tough, cocky,
redheaded fighter. He was a brutally efficient fighter in battle, a hell-raiser,
and a hard living rake off the battlefield. He was amazingly successful against
superior enemies. His key to success was speed and surprise. Tarleton was a
superb rider and could mount horses everyone else considered unmanageable; a
good quality for a cavalry commander.
Cornwallis considered Taralton "as the most brilliant cavalry
commander he had ever seen." In four years of fighting in the North he had risen
to the rank of Colonel and was one of the most famous officers in the British
army in America. However, many British officers who served alongside of Tarleton
considered him totally incompetent and unfit to command troops in battle. These
opinions were well founded. But that is for another book, which has actually
been written.
Tarleton went after Buford, who now commanded the only
organized resistance in the entire South.
The land was in the spring season--just perfect. (So visit in
the spring season.) Visit in the summer? (You have to visit this part of the country
in the summer to realize how miserable it actually is.) In the autumn? (Worse
than summer!) It was almost June. It was indescribably hot, humid, miserable,
unbelievably exhausting.
Buford was not worried. His intelligence told him that
Cornwallis was ten days behind. Tarelton drove hard. He ran horses to their
deaths, and also his men almost to death. He commandeered horses from the farms along
the way, using the pretext that he was confiscating rebel property. He took whatever he could get: riding horses, wagon horses, plow horses. This upset the
loyal Tory farmers greatly, as Tarleton did not always differentiate between
enemy civilians and friendly Tories.
. Tarleton's force consisted of 130 cavalry, 100 infantry, and 40 British
dragoons. Because they were in hot pursuit, all rode double. (Dragoons were
mounted infantry who would ride quickly to the scene of battle, dismount, and fight
as infantry. In this case you had the cavalry up front with the dragoon hanging
on behind.)
Most, if not all, were Loyalists from the Northern campaigns,
for Tarleton was a commander of Loyalists troops. They were from New York and
Pennsylvania and were highly trained, crack troops. These Tories had been badly
mistreated by the Patriots at home and were looking for vengeance. They were
known as Tarleton's Legion. (The British were red coats, or lobster backs. Not
these troopers. They wore green jackets.)
A few British officers had only disdain and contempt for
Loyalist soldiers. They did not think they could fight, so relegated them to
menial jobs as guards, escort work, etc… not so Tarleton. He respected his Tory
men, treated them well. His men loved him. Tarelton's Legion was as good as any
British regulars.
By the time Tarleton caught up with Buford, he had covered
105 miles in 54 hours. A remarkable feat. He did not arrive with the same number
of men that he started with. Some dropped out along the way due to exhaustion.
As for Buford and his 3rd Virginia Regiment, they continued
their retreat unaware of the speed of their pursuer. By now Governor Rutledge
and his party had gone their separate way. Buford joined up with a North
Carolina militia the same size as his own. They combined forces. They
encountered small militia groups. All were in retreat, making their way to their
homes. It is possible that in these contacts upon the limited roads, that Adam
and Andrew Wallace's companies' met while on this confusing retreat. Some of the
smaller militias and the North Carolina militia eventually separated. It was
this confused, mixed force of Patriots that Tarleton would face.
Contact was made while Buford was resting his men near the
North Carolina border. It was a general area known by it's Indian name, Waxhaws.
Tarleton sent a rider ahead under a white flag. Under the
flag was a green-jacketed British officer. The officer told Buford that Tarleton
was close behind with a force of 700 men, and that Cornwallis was just a few
hours behind with 9 battalions. The officer offered the same surrender
terms as given at Charleston. (Charleston Terms of Surrender: Continental
officers would be given parole but would have to remain in the city of
Charleston. Continental soldiers would be made prisoners of war. Militia
soldiers and armed civilians who fought in the battle would be given parole and
allowed to return to their homes.) The Charleston parole terms had advantages to
both sides. The advantage to the Patriots was obvious. To the British way of
thinking: by paroling all these soldiers meant that they did not have to
imprison, and feed them.
As for the entire British army ready to pounce on Burford: It
was a bluff, and Buford knew it was a bluff. Bluffing was a standard military
tactic of the time. However, what if it was not a bluff? Buford could not stand
against Cornwallis' full army.
In truth, Tarleton had less than 250 men together to attack,
and Cornwallis was two days behind.
Buford's intelligence told him that Tarleton was close, only 20 miles behind
with mounted men. They could cover this distance in a short time on horseback.
Buford knew that Tarleton was lying, and Tarleton knew that
Buford knew he was lying. In a clever maneuver, Tarleton was trying to make
Buford stop in place while he considered his proposal. This brief stop would
allow Tarleton’s men to catch up. But Buford did not stop, other than to confer with
all of his officers, one of whom was Adam Wallace.
Buford asked his officers three questions?
1. Shall we surrender?
2. Shall we abandon the baggage train, which is slowing us down and make a more
rapid retreat? (There were 26 wagons of equipment and clothing.)
3. Shall we fortify the wagons and await the attack?
The officers reject the surrender terms, "…it being
incompatible with their honour as soldiers, or the duty they wed their country,
either to surrender or abandon the baggage on the bare statement of Tarleton."
Keep in mind that it was entirely possible that the only
British forces they faced was the officer who rode up with a white flag. It
could all be a bluff. Buford continued his retreat, which meant his regiment was
strung out in march.
As usual, Tarleton would be attacking a larger force with a
smaller one. However, the Americans were strung out in march over a distance of
several miles, with the baggage trains far in advance.
The Americas were caught by surprise as Tarleton moved faster
than they had expected. Tarleton did not attack with his full force. Remember,
they also are strung out due to exhaustion.
What happened next has many versions for such a small battle.
Some historians don't even call it a battle because it was over so quickly.
Buford ordered his men into the safety of the woods. But the woods were
scattered and no obstacle to the cavalry. When the enemy appeared, the Patriots
formed a single line of 150 riflemen. It was a brave move destined for disaster.
Most historians accept the figure of 350 Americans in this
battle. However, reports differ from 300 to 500. Governor Rutledge estimated
400. The average age of the American soldier was 24. It was three o'clock in the afternoon.
Buford faced Tarleton with his 3rd Virginia Regiment and the
remnants of Colonel Washington's cavalry and dragoons. He also had whatever scattered
smaller militia units that happened to be with him at the time.
Throughout the war, Tarleton had disdain for the enemy. He
followed his usual pattern; not hesitating, did not rest or feed his men, not
waiting for the stragglers to catch up. He formed his men loosely. Then charged
headlong with cavalry and infantry at the same time. Who charged where and when
has different versions.
These Continentals had never stood before a cavalry charge,
did not know the speed of galloping horse. Buford ordered his men to hold their
fire until the enemy was at ten paces. When Tarleton heard these words, he knew
that battle was won. For a speeding horse could cover ten yards in just one
second.
The Continentals fired, emptying a few saddles. But the enemy
was upon them before they had time to reload their muskets. The Americans should
have formed three lines, with each rank firing in turn while the others
reloaded. This would have stopped the charge. However, the biggest mistake was
sending the heavy baggage wagons ahead, now some seven miles away. Buford could
have used the wagons for a barrier with the riflemen safely behind. Tarleton
would never have ordered a cavalry charge against fortified wagons defended by
experienced troops.
What is agreed upon is that the Americans fired one volley,
and did not have time to reload. They were now defenseless, as they did not have
fixed bayonets. (Throughout the war, the Americans did not like to fight with
bayonets. They would fight with bayonets at times, but they did not like it.) Except for the officers, the soldiers had no other weapons. The
British were upon them with cavalry sabers and infantry bayonets. Seeing that
their position was impossible, Buford ordered his men to lay down their arms and
surrender. A white flag was raised. Did all of the men obey this order? It is
open to question.
Tarelton’s Legion, Tories, began massacring their fellow
Americans. "The demand for quarter, seldom refused to a vanquished foe, was at
once found to be in vain." Most historians agree that Tarleton did not order the
massacre, neither did he do anything to stop it. (According to the customs of
war, when the enemy laid down their arms and asked to have their lives spared
(quarter) they were spared and taken as captives. However, a little known
variable to the procedure is this: It was not unusual for a soldier to lay down
his arms, ask for quarter, watch to see which way the battle was going. If the
battle turned the other way, he would then pick up his weapon and continue the
fight.)
To surrender was to die, so Adam Wallace picked up his
espontoon (a type of pike) and continued to fight. He would come face to face
with Tarleton and they would duel. It was not just Adam Wallace against Tarleton.
Enemy soldiers surrounded him. Hit from behind, his head was nearly severed.
Circling his body were a ring of dead and wounded Tories. Adam Wallace had sold
his life dearly. My 5th great grandmother, Martha Woods Wallace, sister to
Magdelene, had lost her third son in the war.
The battle was at close quarters. There were no bullet
wounds. It was all hand-to-hand fighting. In fifteen minutes not one American
soldier was left standing. The Tories then, systematically, went from body to
body bayoneting those who still had life. They would use their bayonets to throw
off the bodies on the top to get to the men underneath.
When the massacre was finished the Tories went again from
body to body and stripped the solders of anything of value.
There are many different stories about the battle. I will
give the two most popular; the British view and the American.
The British say that the Americans tricked them. They raised
the white flag. Tarleton rode forward to receive the flag. A shot rang out and
Tarleton's horse went down pinning the leader. The British soldiers believing
their leader was killed by deception, charged furiously.
Another version, and the one most popular with Patriot writers, that Tarleton
tricked Buford by offering the Colonials quarter. When the Patriots laid down
their arms, Tarleton ordered the British troops to attack without mercy.
Alexander Garden of Charleston wrote that it was "...one of Tarleton's most
atrocious acts of barbarity, yet it exalted him in favor of Lord Cornwallis, and
raised his military reputation, in the opinions of the British nation, to the
most exalted degree of perfection."
One "Britisher" wrote about Waxhaws, “...the virtue of humanity
was totally forgotten.”
Those who escaped quickly spread the news of the massacre.
The British soldiers hastily dug a slit trench and buried 84
men; the enemy Tories were laid beside the enemy Patriots. One historian states
that they were buried by the local Patriots attracted to the site by the sounds
of the battle, which carried for miles. I think both versions are right, one
more right than the other. It is known that at least two Patriots were at the
site the first day. I believe, that because the region was so lightly settled,
that a few, maybe a handful, arrived at the scene immediately. They would have
tended to the American wounded and perhaps helped in the burial.
The British surgeon refused to tend to the American wounded.
The British deny this report. However, no American at the scene testified that
the British surgeon cared for the American wounded.
The British losses were minimal at 5 killed and 14 wounded.
(It has long been military tradition to over estimate the enemy casualties and
underestimate your own.) These casualty figures are from Tarleton's own report.
The British left the field the night of the battle.
Tarleton sent word of the wounded to the (Old) Waxhaws
Meeting House. The next morning the women and children drove their farm wagons to
the battle field. The men were away at war, or in British prison camps, or
hiding from the British troops. It would not be a good idea for a male of arms-bearing age to be caught by the British in this part of the country, for this
was the hot bed of revolt. (Taleton and Cornwallis both later stated that the
local Patriots plagued their attempts to conquer North Carolina. Tarleton noted
that in the region of the Waxhaws the enemy was more hostile than anywhere else
in the colonies. This was”...the hornet’s nest of the Revolution,”
– Cornwallis.)
On the second day, the settlers buried an additional 25
soldiers in another common grave 300 yards east of the first. The wounded were
taken to the Waxhaw Meeting House (The Old Presbyterian Church) to be nursed.
The Church still stands and is still active, although, this is the fourth church
building to be erected on the site. The first church was destroyed by the
British, for obvious reasons. In the graveyard next to the church still lie the
graves of those who fought at Waxhaws, and lost.
The wounded were placed on straw, which was used for bedding,
on the floor of the church. The average body received 16 wounds from saber and
bayonet. There were no bullet wounds. The soldiers were nursed continuously.
Among those tending the wounded were Elizabeth Jackson and her two sons, Robert
and 13-year-old Andy. Andy Jackson would one day become the seventh US president.
The Americans suffered 113 killed on the field, 150 wounded,
and 53 taken prisoners. Tarleton paroled the wounded on the spot. This was
mostly a meaningless gesture as most of them would soon die. Indeed, many died
the following day. It was a practical decision on Tarleton's part as they could
not be marched or transported to prison camp. The 53 prisoners were marched to
a camp in Camden.
Parole was a serious business. It meant that you agreed,
under penalty of death, in no way to take part in the war in the future.
Breaking parole would mean death. Both sides would liberally execute parole
violators, whether they had violated their parole or not. You can now see the
problem with the Carolina Tories in not wanting to break their paroles and
taking up arms for the king.
Most of the American officers on horse, including Buford,
made their escape.
Years later Tarleton would write, "The complete success of
this attack, may in great measure, be attributed to the mistakes committed by
the American commander." Those mistakes: Buford should have formed his wagons as
a barricade and the Americans should have fired their first volley at 300-400
yards.
Andrew Jackson talked with some of the survivors. He says of
that historical event, "…that Buford had "made no arrangement to receive an
enemy although he had timely warning of their approach."
Buford requested and received a court martial. He was
exonerated.
Tarleton let it be known that he did not like to take
prisoners. After the battle, Cornwallis sent a letter asking him to prevent his
troops from "committing irregularities."
Adam Wallace; "Enlisted 20 March 1776. 1st Lieutenant, 7th Virginia. Captain 29
June 1778, transferred to 5th Virginia 14 Sept 1778. Served to Jan 1780."
Wallace, Adam (Va). 1st Lieutenant 7th Virginia, 20th March, 1776; Captain 29th
June, 1778; transferred to the 5th Virginia, 14 September, 1778, and served to
January 1780.
Adam Wallace; 10th Virginia at Valley Forge the winter of 1777-1778.
Incorporated into the 4th Virginia, on 10 May 1779 incorporated into the 3rd
Virginia. Regiments officers captured at Charleston. (10th Virginia created
October 1776, 1778 redesignated 6th Virginia.)
"Adam was the captain of one of the companies of the 10th Virginia Regiment of
the Continental Line…was composed of 50 Rockbridge men…the regiment had been
detached from the Northern Army, and ordered to go to the relief…of
Charleston…It was in this terrible encounter that Captain Adam Wallace fell. He
was a young man of 25 years, and stood six feet, two inches, (and a half) in his
stockings--the very picture of vigorous manhood. Colonel Buford, seeing his men
in confusion, fled early in the fight, but young Wallace disdained to fly; and,
standing his ground, met steel with steel--his trusty sword was wielded with
tremendous vigor, and he managed to kill a number of Tarleton's dragoons before
he received the fatal blow which ended his noble young life…That very sword was,
a few years ago, in the possession of Major J. A. R. Varner, of Lexington,
Virginia, himself a descendant of the young hero's brother, Samuel Wallace. It
was an infantry captain's sword, with a buck-horn handle, heavily mounted in
silver. On the clasp nearest the handle is engraved, in clear letters, his
name--'Adam Wallace"'
(This story was told originally by Neander Woods [I think]1905. Then retold by
George Seldon Wallace, 1927. Does the sword still exist today?)
Adam was 6' 2 1/2". You may say that he was not a giant.
However, you must think of Adam Wallace in the context of the times. The average
height of the soldier of the Revolutionary War was 5' 6." In the Civil War, it
was 5' 8." The Revolutionary soldier was 4 inches shorter than today. Add 4
inches to the height of Adam Wallace and today he would be 6' 6 1/2". A giant?
No. But, very tall indeed. (Our Wallace brothers were not the only giants in the
war. Donald Long, Park Ranger at Guilford Court House, tells me that soldiers over 6 feet tall, on both sides, were not uncommon during the war. ( “Looking at period clothing I would say they were spare in body, smaller in
body size more than height. A chest measurement on a grown adult male of 1781
could be easily 34-36 inches or less. Despite their size, if they survived or
missed the killer childhood disease, they were tough folks.) I don’t think ours
were these wiry men. Looking at the sons of Martha Wallace Moon in the famous
Archibald Moon funeral photo, you see our Wallaces to be very tall, strapping
men (chapter 6).
James McDowell, when Governor of Virginia (He was the one who
had little respect for lawyers and was the great grandson of Magdelene), paid a
tribute to his first cousin, twice removed, Adam Wallace. In a speech before the
House of Delegates: “...was an eloquent orator, and also a cogent reasoner.”
"That dark and dismal page in the history of the American Revolution; that
carnival of cruel and unjustifiable slaughter, stamped with the name of Waxhaw,
is illuminated only by the splendid heroism of a soldier from the Valley of
Virginia, whom I am proud to claim as a kinsman, Captain Adam Wallace of
Rockbridge."
Note
Governor James McDowell married his first cousin, Miss
Preston, daughter of Col. William Campbell, who commanded in the battle of
King’s Mountain. Col. William Campbell was wed to the sister of Patrick Henry.
These people were all intermarried in this part of the Valley of Virginia.
“Marriage to close relatives was acceptable practice in both humble and wealthy
families.” – Donald Long
James
McDowell would run for the United States Senate against John Tyler, and lose. As
Vice-president, Tyler would quickly ascend to the presidency; “Tippecanoe and
Tyler too.”
Another note
It is strange how two people, in this case peoples, can
view the same event and come away with starkly differing opinions. Thus, it was
at Waxhaws. To the Americans it was a massacre. To the English people it was a
glorious victory.
The Americans had a very efficient courier system. Within
days, the news of the massacre was carried throughout the colonies and Banastre
Tarleton became the most hated man in the Americas. His exploits, barbarity,
were spoken of in the colonies every day of the war and for generations to come.
Banastre Tarleton believed in total warfare. This was in a time of
chivalry. He burned houses, barns, killed live stock, destroyed crops in the
field. Tarleton did whatever he thought necessary to deny the enemy their
ability to wage war.
When Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, Tarleton surrendered
to the French. If he had surrendered to the Americans he would have been hanged
on the spot. Luckily, he did not sleep in his assigned bed the night of the surrender. In
the morning there were stab wounds in his mattress.
During war, all countries need a hero. Letters of the battle
were sent between Tarleton and Cornwallis, which Cornwallis forwarded to Lord
Germain in London. Exactly one month later these letters were printed in the
"London Gazetter Extraordinary," and quickly reprinted in the newspapers throughout
England.
The British public took a liking to the exploits of this
dashing cavalry officer of the king. England had its hero.
Lord Germain sent Tarleton the king's personal commendation.
The British press would cover Tarleton's brilliant career.
Such was the attention of the press, and adulation of the British people, that
Banastre Tarleton would come out of the war the most popular soldier on the
British side. He was honored everywhere he went. Banastre Tarleton was consort
to the Prince of Wales. He was the sought after guest for parlors, parties,
balls, all social events. He had a long running affair with England's greatest
actress. (She was previously the mistress to the same Prince of Wales.)
Tarleton's name and life were covered in the regular press and the gossip press.
As they say today, "He was good press." Tarleton sold papers. His popularity
would remain until the day he died in 1833.
In England, one's military career was politically connected.
Tarleton made the mistake of backing the wrong people. This effectively ended
his career. His reputation was made in only one war. He would be an officer (in
reserve) on half-pay for most of his life. He would have brief recalls, which
would enable him to be knighted and called Sir Banaster Tarleton, and retire at
the rank of general.
Four times he was elected to Parliament. He would marry a duke’s
daughter, 20 years his junior, and have no children, thus no direct descendants today.
A superstar during his life, he would pass into obscurity. Until recently, no
one in England would know of the man, that is until a few years go when a movie
came out titled ”The Patriot.” The evil British Colonel “Tavington” portrayed in
the movie was based upon the real life Tarleton.
In correspondence with historian Rix Booraem; he tells us
that "Sure, Tarleton was ambitious and ruthless, but "Tavington" in the film
wasn't just a bad guy; he was a monster, a sadistic psychopath who would have
been disowned by the British army in the 18th Century."
Tarleton wrote a 500 page book that is still read today. He
has a biography written about his life. As we have seen, he even has a movie.
200 years later his magnificent full uniformed portrait by Sir Joshua Reynolds,
still hangs in the National Gallery in London.
He would die in 1833, and now lies in an untended grave in
the Leintwardine Church yard in Leintwardine, England.
For Adam Wallace, all we have is a common grave and signature
on his will, for which we can all be proud.
An account of Adam Wallace’s death appeared in The Maryland
Journal, and Baltimore Advertiser, Tuesday, July 18, 1780 issue. (Article
printed in italics.)
In justice to the memory of Capt Adam Wallace who fell in the late actions at
the Wax Saws, in South Carolina, we think ourselves bound to give the Public the
following account of his bravery on that unhappy occasion, as it is certified by
a number of officers and soldiers, in Col. Buford’s regiment, who were
eye-witnesses to the transaction. When the enemy made the attack Captain Wallace
was posted on the right; after the exchange of several shot, Colonel Buford
ordered his men to ground their arms to which Captain Wallace complied (as to
ceasefiring) but instead of meeting with that reception which the feelings of
humanity dictates, or that clemency which our conquered foes have ever received
at our hands, no quarters were given; on which he ordered his men to sell their
lives as dear as possible he bravely defended himself against a number who
assailed him on all sides, he was seen to make several lunges at Col Tarliton
(who commanded the enemy’s party) whilst he was thus engaged, he received a blow
to the back of his neck, which nearly severed his head from his body, and was
found dead on the field, with a British officer at his feet: thus was massacred
a man whose bravery merits universal applause. Col. Tarliton, the next day
publicaly mentioned his bravery; which he said, entitled him to immortal honour.
My family history web site has 79 chapters. If you would like
to know more about the other chapters then go to my Home Page
www.thetracyfamilyhistory.net
![]()
